Jump to content

ASAF

Member
  • Content count

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ASAF


  1. 20 hours ago, Saundo said:

    Problem is, most of the people that do that are the officers that are higher ranked.

    if higher ups are doing this they should be removed from there rank simple as that, if i was put into the commissioners shoes i would instantly start demoting everyone that simply joins to do fed then leaves.

    • Like 1

  2. to add onto my comment, as rebels if you are robbing the bank/fed you are normally doing it with everyone online at that time to increase chances of getting out with the gold/money, you will rarely see gangs doing it with only some members, so if a gang member gets on and the bank/fed just goes off its almost always because they JUST got on, and not to help with bank/fed.


  3. From reading most of what people have to say about cops logging in and responding to bank/fed it has come clear that some people don't understand whats really going on (This is a rebel point of view*WARNING*)

     

    Let's first be real with ourselves, when Bank or federal reserve is hit off on a slow day, morning or at night, you will always see at least 2+ Police Officers jump on, let it be known the came on not to patrol, not to go out with another officer and clean up the streets, but purely for the action that commences during bank robberies and federal reserve heists, and most of the people that log on for said purpose are not staying long after, this should not only be against the rules(although if you think about it, it technically is), it should also be frowned upon by higher-ups as people in the police force that work as a officer of the law to just get some action in during federal reserve or bank is not what being a whitelisted officer is about, and as someone who barely ever plays as a cop or medic, i still understand that.

     

    • Like 3

  4. Coming from my point of view (Pure Rebel):

    When there's a minimum of 6 cops online there's normally very few rebel gangs with numbers that exceed the police, when there are 6 cops, it's either late night or early morning, both times of day affect both parties, so there is not a disadvantage to either side. The only way i can see a disadvantage is when a gang plans a fed early/late when theres the minimum police force and there are Gang members exceeding the police by a large amount.

     

    Now when cops log on purely for the reason that bank and federal Reserve goes off, it is infact meta gaming, pure and simple, and we all know meta gaming is a rule that is not meant to be broken, which leads me to another point, When we go to loot cop guns we kill, they instantly respawn when  we walk up, they shouldn't be able to do this so quick, sometimes i think cops have less of a wait then civilians after they are killed (Normally we get 2 minutes or 25 seconds) while i rarely see police having to wait that 2 minutes which i think is unfair for us as half of our income is from police  firearms and other things such as attachments.

    Which brings me to my next point:

    I feel like when you die, your gun should STAY on the floor for at least 5 minutes so both parties have time to come and regain there lost firearms, Not to comeback (NLR) and get them, but for fellow officers and gang members to use again, i can tell mixed feelings for this will come up from the police as there guns are dirt cheap compared to us, but its my opinion.


  5. 19 hours ago, Mercy said:

    Is there a way to join APSS? Or any other Ainc alternatives?

    APSS Split up, best chance to get anything close to what AINC was is by joining Evolved, they are a Cartel rather than a Civilian Contractors but they still hold a similar role when it comes to interaction with police, obviously since they are a cartel its more criminal but its as close as you are going to get right now.


  6. More jobs for people that don't want to be rebels, EMS or APD, Civilian jobs like helicopter flights(which i know people do but make if official and get the server to hire good pilots for it.) and things like that, this will decrease the amount of kidnappings by people that ask if you need a ride, like a uber or something similar. Shooting ranges, more events for civilians rather than events only rebels can really do (Airdrop,underwater boat), events for civilians will be strictly legal, not giving you illegal guns, clothing etc etc.


  7. 23 hours ago, Aidanjr said:

    That's understandable mate but let's face it, this community is a mature community and so people are expected to act in a mature and sensible way, and so people should look past the emphasis on the knock down message and realise it is not verbal abuse directly from a close rival.

    I do however agree that people can get in funny moods and that it happens to the best of us. Everyone is different after all.

    Perhaps with more community input in this specific manner the message could be changed to a censored version of "f#ck".

    Once again, constructive criticism is appreciated.

     

    Just gonna get my last words in as i have expressed my opinion enough: If you really think the Altis Community are mature, I invite you to our five-star show at Rebel 1, or a nice relaxing evening dinner at Sydney market.

    • Like 2

  8. 21 hours ago, Unit_3397 said:

    Wasteland has its up and down days... 

    Its delicate thing to control, but the way I go about it currently is give a rcon warning to watch abbusive language, then kick if happens again...

    maybe not all feeds, but if somethings said on either proxy or global we generally step in...

     

    if we were to knuckle down on it, all servers should get a pop up message when you join that states main regulations, and 2 buttons ( agree to terms/ leave) 

    that way by accepting, then  deliberately breaking a rule, admins/ mods can ban without hesitation... Then when they complain or apply for a ban lift we can use that against em...

     

    but still, hard thing to control... 

     

    //iphone 

     

    Kinda harsh to ban people for swearing just cause they agreed to something they are already agreeing to when joining ( simply being on the server you agree to its rules and conditions ), and obviously we still have rule breakers, i'd say simply regulate Side channel and global, the rest are personal channels that i think shouldn't be controlled(unless its like some hardcore slander/racism.)


  9. 19 hours ago, Aidanjr said:

    I see "knocked the f#ck down" as an emphasis on knocked down, and it is not verbally directed at someone, therefore I do not view it as a derogatory or abusive manner to said player named in the "knock down" message.

    I only bring up people on foul language as I said before, if it is directed at someone, or if it is excessive foul language. As that message is simply emphasising the "knocked the f%ck down" it is not considered derogatory or abusive compared to "(name) is a f#ckwit" 

    Thats my opinion on the knock down message, I appreciate criticism and feedback.

     

    I see your point but lets face it, not everyone thinks the same, and not everyone will see it like this, Lets talk about what happens to the point of seeing this message, what happens, and what after happens.

     

    You would normally see this message in combat situations, tense situations with others, that are treated competitively ( very competitive among gangs fighting rival gangs ). so, as expected on the internet it could obviously lead to unhappy people becoming even more unhappy, which morally you want to not fuel.

     

    Again the whole  " So and So got knocked the Fuck Down by So and So " can be viewed many ways, this is my general view at the moment.


  10. I also believe people within groups should be able to use the language they ( the group ) are fine with, for many reasons.

    1st reason is that most groups are friends, and are generally not populated with people on the young side. This impacts a lot, for 1 it impacts one of the main reasonings we have language rules, that is kids, and this also comes back to why i think we should give gangs the ability to decide whether they will allow ' swearing ', it gives more freedom to groups. 

    2nd reason is because not everyone is seeing the 'swearing', this is not the Side Channel or global, this is Group.

     

    Feel tree to comment on this.

×