Zombine45

That's specifically what we don't want.

While it is always unfortunate to lose a reward vehicle or easter egg, i don't think they're going to open up a griefing opportunity this large. If you lose connection or your pilot dies, then that's just how the game goes, it sucks but you've got to move on. Just bad luck really.

Would it be possible to swap out one of the marshalls in the car park for a marid? Mix up the firepower a bit?

Well, if you don't have access to the sniper, a machine gun on a vehicle, ether from an APC or an MRAP, take out the tires, then clean up all the infantry.(Very carefully placed cannon fire from a gorgon works too) Or, a way i've only done once before, sneak up on them and capture the vehicle without alerting them.(This one took about 25 minutes)

Look man, there isn't much the admins can do for you in the moment at 10 in the morning on a Friday. If you're so sick of this happening, then play on the server at a time when there IS an admin around. Please don't post these screenshots/videos on a thread in the forums, as Nova said several times, send them to the server admins on the forums.

Have you done what Nova said and taken screenshots/videos to the staff on the forums? If you haven't then just listing their names on the forums isn't going to get you anywhere.

Ammo crates at the ammo depot's seem to spawn with one(1) of every kind of ammo, it's nice for the variety but terrible for rearming off.

I'll save you all the trouble and post this now, just the first ~30sec will do Battlefield 1942 Main Theme Either that or the BF2142 Wake Island Theme, again the first ~30sec will be fine.

I think we need to start seeing more passive threats in the AO. We need to move past "Is there any movement? No? Then its safe!". I'd like to see minefields around the AO and the HQ(To prevent the HQ rush), IED's on major roads and roadblocks on smaller ones (Maybe ones the bobcat can remove?) I know all of this is a lot of work @Fitz but it's just some things to take into mind

I definitely agree the current process of clearing buildings is a bit lackluster, however i'm not sure how much can be done towards the goal that wouldn't affect performance.

While this would be a really neat idea, as nova said, it's a huge amount of effort to change everything over. It isn't just changing the base units to CSAT, you then have to change all the AO's and side missions to be NATO. (There's a lot of those) It IS a cool idea, but it isn't worth the effort it would take to do it.

DON'T YOU DARE TALK LIKE THAT. I get enough of it on the server already while driving the marid

This thread is becoming pretty hilarious. @GranteusMate there isn't any possible way they can be more clear than they are currently being. It isn't something they're giving away for free so you gotta work for it. It's their way of rewarding the dedicated players and based on what I've read in this thread, you don't fall under that category, you might just want to give up as continuing this isn't going to get you anywhere. Also i don't see how anyone could have such an interest in these skins, unless you just want to feel better than everyone else by having them.

It was a good run @Fitz , but i guess your time has come...

As much as i'd be all for longer night time, i don't think it would increase player experience on the server.

You understand now that you've gone and said it, it's never going to go away. Second modded server maybe?

Are all the terrain mods required? As in, if the server is only going to be using the CUP cherno map, will the other terrain pack be needed?

The Armata doesn't have a 152mm in reality, why would it in Arma?

@Granteus While Tac-Ops is next, i don't think they are planning to have many sweeping changes to the way infantry play, probably just some new weapons and features. While armoured vehicles have had major problems since release that have taken a long time to fix. @InfamousNova C'mon man you know the only DLC i care about is the tanks one. They're just making sure i don't go on a rampage before they release it.

If you don't mean milsim, then don't say milsim. It's pretty simple. If you say milsim, people are going to assume that's what you mean.

Jesus guys, i think you need to chill the hell out. I'm pretty sure starting a flame war is against forum rules, just pointing that out.

Lol, "nightstalker scope" and "milsim" don't belong in the same post.

I'm definitely going to be using mines more now, rules permitting. The mine dispenser is going to change things. I also think marking guidelines need to be set very clearly.

Unfixable Bug = Feature