sirgeneralj

Anybody remember another particular server that died after it removed Kavala/Sydney....... Bring it back before its too late... (just saying)

There seems to be a number of people saying “If we could get a working judicial system”, however the judicial system works perfectly except for one thing. There is no punishment for purposely continuously putting off court cases. If this was added (which it could be in common law anyways, without the need for edits to the documentarion) everything would work smoothly (AKA the cop force can’t just keep putting off them losing money). The full system itself works quite fine at the moment as evidenced by the many past cases we have had, the thing is most players want to run around and shoot eachother, not sit and argue in court, so unless you make the court system just a 1v1 pistol shootout, good luck. (There’s even a arbitration system for smaller civil matter to ensure its easy to access and that it takes less time) People are here to role play while shooting, not role play while argueing, and that’s the real problem if you want to get the judicial system used. (And maybe slightly that the people appointed in charge of it (attorney general) more recently have displayed very little attention to it to get new lawyers)

Just about all the judicial government documents and stuff. Just wanting to talk to you as you are pretty much running straya. Trying to get the best outcome for everyone :)

Is there any chance of having a friendly chat you you, Mr. Red, about a few documents on Strayagaming?

Bring back the short sleeve black cop uniform for pub slots but anyone could wear anyway XD

Name: Jack Fire Callsign: K06W Date of Disciplinary Action: 02/12/2017 What Disciplinary Action was placed against you: Demotion Who were you Disciplined by: Augnov (Well Mitch really but yeh) Reason for Disciplinary Action against you: Accidentally leaving a man restrained in PD. Automatically unrestrained after 15 or so minutes Why the appeal should be accepted: Even the person who I left restrained disagrees with the punishment as being way over the top (For example the other day an officer dropped a person in cuffs in the water and got a verbal warning for it). Infact he even admits he regrets taking it up because of the level of punishment that was made. I have only had a warning from about 2 years ago as previous disciplinary action however taking up 15 minutes of this mans time, who was meant to be going to gaol anyway if I had not offered to release him on community service, was judged to be worth a demotion. I believe this is harshly overzealous and was influenced by my past, expunged, disciplinary actions as well as my past status within the police force, which I feel is extremely unfair as an officer attempting to work my way up the ranks again. I showed remorse for my actions offered to fully compensate the person who experienced the trouble (to stop any legal action and because I knew I had made a mistake and wanted to make it fair for the person who I had hurt), however I was told to not compensate the man but that I would "still" face a demotion. The person appeared to be unrestrained as I pulled him out of my vehicle so I immediately ran to the bus to help fellow officers who were in a firefight. I was told my actions still required a demotion because they were "reckless" however the definition of a reckless action requires intent to commit the action in the first place. I was more then upfront about the mistake, in fact I didn't even claim meta-game for "finding" my name when I was masked and in SRT blacks. Any other information: The decision of what was going to happen to me was obviously made before I even got to put my side forward and I believe such is unfair. @kiwisniper @Augnov

Heres a fact. Ropeplaying killing 92 people and then roleplaying that you have a video when you have not actually killed 92 people is actually FailRP as you are introducing something static into the RP which is not consistent with events. (e.g. it cannot be rebutted but it is also not true) To put it simply, the only way to have a video in roleplay is if you actually did it in roleplay. Although you could always try to roleplay it was a CGI video to make it not FailRP.... But then all police have to do is a frame by frame analysis to see the difference as RP is meant to represent something close to life, and there's no CGI so perfect in a video it cannot be distinguished.

Sounds pretty goooood

Merry Christmas Everyone!!!! Hope y’all get some good prezzies

Helps cycle players when the servers full ;)

The plots so thick I have lost sight of land By the time we finish this saga we will by up to 10,000 posts.

To whom it may concern, @Milkdud @Anti-Wingman @Mitch @Augnov @Matthew On the 8th of December, 2017, the Royal Commission into Police Misconduct and Corruption will be officially opened at 9:00 AM Sydney Time. This Commission is set to run for two months, ending on the 8th of February 2018, Close of Business (5:30 PM). This Commission may be shortened upon release of its final report or extended if the situation requires. Due to the current lack of Attorney General, I Jack Fire, Director of Public Prosecutions, shall be opening this Royal Commission. This Commission is being opened after numerous reports of misconduct by high ranks in the police force and after review of disciplinary actions taken against officers within the force. This Royal Commission shall be led by Commissioner Stalker, with three other Commissioners, The Honourable Nevetos, TH3GamingBanana and The Honourable A. Steinz also taking on responsibilities. Further Deputy Commissioners may be appointed at a later date Positions may become open to the public to assist this Commission as a "Royal Commission Member," reviewing evidence and the like. The Commission will be split into 3 major divisions: Police Misconduct Police Corruption Police Disciplinary Misconduct (Primarily in the way of overzealous punishments) Forms will be made available to those who wish to submit any reports into any of the above categories or anything which they feel must be disclosed. These forms will be open to Police, Paramedics and the general public. All respondents will have the option of opting to remain anonymous to the public (a name is required so the Commissioners can confirm your story). These forms will become available at a later date. The Commissioners shall have the power to summon persons to the commission for questioning, to hear reports in private or in public, to subpoena any documents relevant to the Commission and to hold organizations or persons in contempt and issue fines or prison sentences for such contempt. At the conclusion of the Commission and throughout the Commission at the discretion of the Commissioners, reports will be released in regards to the findings of the Commission and any suggestions for the future. All Relevant Information, posts and such can be found here. Reports forms will also be made available here over the next week: https://strayagaming.com.au/forum/815-royal-commission-into-police-misconduct-and-corruption/ Jack Fire, Director of Public Prosecutions

By order of Jack Fire, Director of Public Prosecutions, the following persons are considered "protected." Commissioner Stalker Deputy Commissioner A. Steinz Deputy Commissioner TH3gamingBanana Deputy Commissioner Nevetos They may not be demoted or have disciplinary action taken against them unless it can be proven that such action has not amounted from the fulfillment of their duties within the Royal Commission. The above list may be expanded at any time to include new Deputy Commissioners and any members which join the Commission. Any decision to demote such a person is appealable to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal due to the protected manner of their position. (Where the organisation taking disciplinary action must prove legitimacy) This protection is active for one week until 23:59, 15/12/17 Jack Fire

1. The Commission must inquire into the following matters; Police Misconduct while on duty Especially in regards to the role models and superior officers within the force The integrity of officers whilst on duty The use of rank to influence the decisions of others for personal gains The Effects of Police Misconduct on the Public and other officers Police Disciplinary Actions, in particular; Misconduct within the disciplinary committees The existence of overzealous punishments and the effects of such Lack of due process Lack of a fair appeals process Influence of corruption and misconduct within the command team and cabinet on these disciplinary actions. The effect of illegitimate Police Disciplinary Actions Police Corruption The existence of police corruption at all levels of the Australian Federal Police Particularly that of corruption within the command team and cabinet The effect of corruption on the police force Whether the findings in regards to part 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 are due to; The existence of a particular culture The potential rewards for misconduct The lack of disciplinary action taken on a group The Effectiveness of current mechanisms to reduce breaches in regards to 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 as well as redress those who suffer as a result of such actions The Australian Federal Police Disciplinary Committee The Discipline and Blacklist Appeals Team The Courts The Federal Prosecution Service The adequacy of; Current Legislation External bodies to moderate the Australian Federal Police The Limits on the Abilities of the Australian Federal Police Self Regulations applied by the Australian Federal Police Possible implementation of further oversight and mechanisms to reduce the possibility of future wrongdoings in relation to parts 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3, including but not limited too; A full legislative and executive government such as that set out the Consitution fo Australian Altis Internal Affairs A Civilian-Based Police Integrity Commission Formally produced disciplinary regulations as well as regulations binding on the conduct of disciplinary committees An oversight committee on police disciplinary actions An organisation to review and create statistics in regards to disciplinary action on officers. The ability for officers to access their own disciplinary records Anything which the Commissioners feel is required to be investigated in the name of due diligence after finding out information in the course of running the Commission 2. The Commission Must Report all Relevant Findings to Appropriate Authorities Due to the matter of investigation, there shall be no requirement to report anything to the Australian Federal Police's internal mechanisms for discipline. The Commission shall be required to forward issues which, in their opinion warrant criminal proceedings, to the Director of Public Prosecutions If the Australian Federal Police attempt to unduly influence the Federal Prosecution Service, all criminal proceedings may be pursued by those appointed by the Attorney General or in his stead, the Commissioner of this Commission See Section 3 for details in regards to disciplinary actions 3. If the Commission Finds a Disciplinary Action to by Unjust, Unfair or Wrong by Any Other Means They May; Notify the individual of the possibility of appeal Report the Commissions Opinion to the Australian Federal Police, with the suggestion to revoke or reduce the disciplinary punishment. Suggest an action be wiped from an officers record Refer a complainant to the Administrative Appeal Tribunal on all grounds listed under the "Altis Judicial Guidelines" as well as if the punishment was unjust or incorrect compared to previous actions. (This increases the scope of the power of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Refer the Disciplinary Actioners to the Director of Public Prosecutions Provide Legal Support to those who require it to fight the disciplinary action in court 4. The Production of Reports The Commission is to produce a public report on the misconduct of officers within the Australian Federal Police The Commission is to produce a public report on disciplinary actions within the police force and any misconduct or failure of any disciplinary mechanisms within the Australian Federal Police The Commission is to produce a public report on corruption within the Australian Police Force The Commission is to produce minor reports on any significant situation which occurs and how to better deal with it in the future. (At the discretion of the Commissioners) The Commission is to produce a final report on the improvement of mechanisms, statutes, and moderators in regards to the content of reports 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 as well as a summary of the content of reports 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 The Commission may produce other private and public reports at their own discretion. All such reports are required by March 2018 if not before 5. Tenure of the Commission The Commission shall be active between 9:00 8/12/2017 (Sydney Time) until 17:30 8/2/2017 (Sydney Time) unless an extension is granted The Attorney General may close the commission sooner at their own discretion If the Commissioner is under the impression the Attorney General is under undue influence due to another party when closing The Commission or when considering an extension of tenure, the Commissioner may refuse to close the Commission and may also grant their own extension Any attempt to influence a Commissioner or the Attorney General in regards to the tenure of this commission is a criminal offence, punishable by up to 20 years imprisonment and/or a $1,000,000 fine (Increased to $25,000,000 if they are a representative of an organization) The Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioners (Referred to as "The Commissioners") may only be dismissed by the Attorney General due to misconduct in the investigation. Such a dismissal shall be challengable in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The Attorney General may appoint a Commissioner is none already exists The Attorney General may appoint Deputy Commissioners. The Commissioner may appoint members of the commission to carry out duties however such members do not hold the full powers of a Commissioner as set out by the "Altis Judicial Guidelines" 6. Handling of Top Secret Documents The Commission may only subpoena documents regarded as "top secret" as a matter of necessity The Necessity of such subpoenas may be judged by the Commissioner and his or her proxy (must be a Deputy Commissioner). Such a judgment is unappealable. The overclassification of documents in attempt to cover up corruption or misconduct is a criminal offense, punishable by 30 years in prison and/or a $1,500,000 fine Top Secret documents shall be held in a separate secure area to which "members" have no access Top Secret documents may be declassified if the Commission is satisfied the documents pose no threat to the national security of Australian Altis or any current police operations. This is appealable but only on the grounds that the judgment of the Commission is incorrect. Evidence must be submitted to stay the release of the documents within 24 hours of the initial request or such an appeal is voided. Using such an appeal purely to delay the release may result in the court holding the Australian Federal Police and its legal counsel in contempt of the court. Any Top Secret document may be declassified by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in a Freedom of Information hearing. 7. These Terms of Reference may be expanded at any time by the Attorney General providing that 2 days notice is given for such

All the hidden posts gotcha goen crazy They dont count :P